Type Number for Location Report

CONTACT NUMBER FOR "SM INSPECTIONS," LEGAL FIRM CALLED BACK TALKED WITH INV. ANDERSON EXPLAINED WHY I HAD BEEN CONTACTED OUR LIEN HOLDER WAS WANTING TO GO LEGITIMATE AGAINST ME, THE RESEARCHER COULD HELP ME OUT AND PREVENT ME FROM GETTING SUED AND CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST ME.

<p>Scam. </p>Caller Message: We assist companies obtain gear and cash with lender or press one to find out press should be taken off the list.

Named and explained I'd problem with scam over my tax returns from 2004 to 2008. I owed 11,000 in back-taxes. I'd only one opportunity to settle debt at time of local call. Or even. Then a guarantee granted for my charge for tax evasion and sham. They refused to get attorney contact them. They express all my assets is going to be tied-up by court-order. They certainly were very daunting, irritating and extremely threatening. government never calls to be in debt over desk phone. I called where they called from and offered them their quantity and FBI.

Difficult to realize on machine. Seemed to be Kevin threatening activity of some sort. Called twice. Used to do not return his calls.

V- email msg suggests the IRS is processing to call-back quickly and a lawsuit

Additionally had the robot government call. Not really a reliable phone-calls

Says I have before the 10th to survey to legal steps or federal magistrate will be taken. Everyday anyway to stop these folks They call,. I'm on DoN't call record, I've set a monitor on this number, I've documented them to Attorneygeneral. This number use to exhibit up from Madison, WI someplace in Iowa and now it displays via TX.

Suit has been recorded against me and is extremely time-sensitive. If my lawyer of record or I do not contact them instantly all the best.

This quantity left four communications at my household in one single morning saying that I owed the IRS a large number of dollars and also to contact them quickly. Absolutely a con.

It had been a recorded information telling I'd determined a prison. The treasury would definitely fit me before a national Magistrate unless this range to talk to a national agent was termed by me. However it was a "individual caller" on my caller identity. Not a government quantity from D.C. the device number was authorized to your telecommunciations business in Austin, Texas. Where I have never been or done any company with. So......HaHa